{"id":883,"date":"2010-05-30T00:38:18","date_gmt":"2010-05-30T06:38:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cookcountypd.org\/blog\/?p=883"},"modified":"2010-06-01T16:01:49","modified_gmt":"2010-06-01T22:01:49","slug":"improper-burden-shifting-requires-reversal-notice-of-appeal-practice-point","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/2010\/05\/30\/improper-burden-shifting-requires-reversal-notice-of-appeal-practice-point\/","title":{"rendered":"IMPROPER BURDEN SHIFTING REQUIRES REVERSAL  &#038; NOTICE OF APPEAL PRACTICE POINT"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"yiv1290442994\" style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; font-family: arial; color: black; font-size: x-small; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><\/p>\n<div style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; clear: both; text-align: left; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: small; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\">Roderick Smith&#8217;s conviction for\u00a0<span id=\"lw_1275201101_1\" style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; border-bottom-style: dotted; border-bottom-width: 2px; border-bottom-color: #366388; cursor: pointer; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\">attempt murder<\/span> of a\u00a0<span id=\"lw_1275201101_2\" style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\">Chicago Police Officer<\/span> is reversed and remanded for a new trial in this opinion by JUSTICE NEVILLE\u00a0 because of three comments in the State&#8217;s rebuttal argument in a trial before the Hon. Judge Lacy. These comments all questioned the\u00a0<span id=\"lw_1275201101_3\" style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; cursor: pointer; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: none; border-bottom-width: initial; border-bottom-color: initial; background-position: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\">lack of evidence<\/span> that one would have &#8220;expected&#8221; to come from the defense&#8230;to wit &#8220;Have you heard any evidence that he didn&#8217;t know they were the police?&#8221;<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; clear: both; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: small; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; clear: both; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: small; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\">However, the\u00a0<span id=\"lw_1275201101_4\" style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; border-bottom-style: dotted; border-bottom-width: 2px; border-bottom-color: #366388; cursor: pointer; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\">Appellate Court<\/span> did not reach defendant&#8217;s conviction for aggravated battery because\u00a0 the notice of appeal (NOA) &#8220;lists only the\u00a0<span id=\"lw_1275201101_5\" style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; cursor: pointer; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: none; border-bottom-width: initial; border-bottom-color: initial; background-position: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\">attempt murder conviction<\/span> from which he takes this appeal. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction to review the aggravated battery conviction.&#8221; [!!!]<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; clear: both; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><span style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: small; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\">Please note that it seems that the State Appellate Defender is aware of this strict jurisdictional issue and regularly is granted leave by the reviewing courts to amend NOAs to reflect all the convictions\/judgments on the mittimus. The above appeal was handled by private counsel.\u00a0 Good practice requires listing all counts on the NOA upon which judgment was entered against the defendant. Read all about it here at\u00a0<span style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; text-decoration: underline; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.state.il.us\/court\/Opinions\/AppellateCourt\/2010\/1stDistrict\/May\/1072101.pdf\">People v.<\/a><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.state.il.us\/court\/Opinions\/AppellateCourt\/2010\/1stDistrict\/May\/1072101.pdf\"> <\/a><span style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; text-decoration: underline; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><span id=\"lw_1275201101_6\" style=\"line-height: 1.2em; outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; cursor: pointer; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: none; border-bottom-width: initial; border-bottom-color: initial; background-position: initial initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.state.il.us\/court\/Opinions\/AppellateCourt\/2010\/1stDistrict\/May\/1072101.pdf\">Roderick Smith<\/a><\/span><\/span>, No .1-07-2101, 5\/6\/2010.<\/span><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Roderick Smith&#8217;s conviction for\u00a0attempt murder of a\u00a0Chicago Police Officer is reversed and remanded for a new trial in this opinion by JUSTICE NEVILLE\u00a0 because of three comments in the State&#8217;s rebuttal argument in a trial before the Hon. Judge Lacy. These comments all questioned the\u00a0lack of evidence that one would have &#8220;expected&#8221; to come from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/883\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}