<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
 <!-- Mobile Specific Metas-->
  <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
 <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="../images/favicon.ico">
 
 
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../bootstrap.css">
  <!-- Scripts-->
<script src="../jquery-2.1.4.min.js"></script>
<script src="../bootstrap.js"></script>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
{"id":176,"date":"2008-05-13T14:09:37","date_gmt":"2008-05-13T20:09:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cookcountypd.org\/blog\/2008\/05\/13\/court-set-to-revisit-chimel-and-belton\/"},"modified":"2008-06-05T07:19:23","modified_gmt":"2008-06-05T13:19:23","slug":"court-set-to-revisit-chimel-and-belton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/2008\/05\/13\/court-set-to-revisit-chimel-and-belton\/","title":{"rendered":"Court Set to Revisit Chimel and Belton"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After arresting the driver of a car the police may search that car&#8230;.or maybe not. In <em>Arizona v Grant<\/em>,\u00a0 2007 Ariz. LEXIS 73 the usually pro state Arizona Supreme Court said the following.&#8221;This case requires us to determine whether the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s warrant requirement permits the warrantless search of an arrestee&#8217;s car when the scene is secure and the arrestee is handcuffed, seated in the back of a patrol car, and under the supervision of a police officer. We hold that in such circumstances, a warrantless search is not justified.&#8221;Not surprisingly, the U.S. Supreme Court has granted certiori at 2008 U. S. LEXIS 2022. Until such time as the\u00a0U.S. Supreme Court explains how the Arizona court&#8217;s clear reasoning is in error, members should raise this issue in car search cases.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After arresting the driver of a car the police may search that car&#8230;.or maybe not. In Arizona v Grant,\u00a0 2007 Ariz. LEXIS 73 the usually pro state Arizona Supreme Court said the following.&#8221;This case requires us to determine whether the search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment&#8217;s warrant requirement permits the warrantless search [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/local3315.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}